Granada CF - Rayo Vallecano de Madrid Betting Tip, Prediction & Odds
Looking for betting odds on Granada CF vs Rayo Vallecano de Madrid? We provide all stats, odds, predictions and tips for the upcoming clash. Our sports betting editorial team will help you find the perfect betting tip with the best odds! We provide crucial statistics and top analysis for your successful bet!
Granada CF | Rayo Vallecano de Madrid |
Both Granada CF and Rayo Vallecano de Madrid will be looking for a strong showing when they meet at the Estadio Nuevo Los Cármenes on , with both sides looking for three points for differing reasons. However, it is Granada CF who are the favourites to come away with all three points.
Top betting markets and tips ahead of kick-off
Match facts and statistics
- Both Teams To Score Yes/NoYes 49%No 51%
- Total Goals Over/Under 2.5Over 43%Under 57%
- Total Goals Over/Under 3.5Over 22%Under 78%
Granada CF vs Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: The most attractive odds ahead kick-off
Performance analysis of both teams in comparison
Last Meetings
- Granada CF - Rayo Vallecano de Madrid2-204/03/2022
- Rayo Vallecano de Madrid - Granada CF4-008/29/2021
Granada CF Form
- On the previous matchday Atlético Madrid played against Granada CF 3 - 1.
- In the past 6 months, the team won of 1 games. 5 of these were home games and 1 of those duels were lost.
- The team has scored a total of number of 1 goals in the last 1 month. This is an average of 1 goals per match.
Rayo Vallecano de Madrid Form
- Rayo Vallecano de Madrid played UD Almería in their last match 0 - 2.
- In the past 6 months Rayo Vallecano de Madrid achieved 5 wins, draws and 5 losses in the record.
- On average, Rayo Vallecano de Madrid's goal rate in the last month is exactly 1.12 goals per game. So in total, fans got to cheer 19 times about a goal.
Granada CF vs Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: Tip from our football experts
Our expert tip for the upcoming match is to bet on Three-Way Bet. This market is available at a price of 8/5 from 888sport, with a probability rating of 42% demonstrating its likelihood.